Quarterly Market Update · Jan–Mar 2026 · Issued June 2026

Queensland Coal Exports

The latest quarter at a glance: Q1 2026 volume, markets and ports, with recent-year history shown for trend and seasonality.

Queensland: Australia's largest metallurgical (coking) coal exporter
Q1 2026 export volume
44.1 Mt
+3.1% YoY
Q1 2026 export value
A$9.9 bn
+6.8% YoY
Top Q1 market
Japan
9.5 Mt this quarter
Busiest Q1 port
Gladstone Port
15.3 Mt this quarter
The latest quarter

Q1 2026 at a glance

January–March 2026, against the same quarter last year and the prior quarter.

Q1 2026 export volume
44.1 Mt
+3.1%vs Q1 2025
-18.8%vs 2025 Q4
Top destination market
Japan
9.5 Mtshipped this quarter
Busiest loading port
Gladstone Port
15.3 Mtloaded this quarter

Quarterly volume, last 3 years (Mt)

Green bars mark Q1 (Jan–Mar), usually the softest quarter; grey bars are Q2–Q4.

Top Q1 2026 destinations (Mt)

MarketMtShare
1Japan9.521%
2India9.221%
3South Korea7.918%
4China4.811%
5Vietnam4.19%
6Taiwan1.74%
7Netherlands1.43%
Others5.512%
Q1 2026 shipped 44.1 Mt, +3.1% on Q1 2025 but -18.8% on 2025 Q4. Q1 (Jan–Mar) is usually the softest quarter as the North Queensland wet season disrupts rail haulage and port loading; volumes typically rebuild through Q2–Q4.
Trend context

Export trend explorer

How Q1 2026 sits against history. View by quarter to see seasonality or by year for the long trend; switch between shipped volume and export value, and break the totals down by grade, region or port.

Granularity
Measure
Breakdown
Annual export volume is structurally flat, 193204 Mt across 2021–2025, so vessel-call demand is steady. The real swing factor is price, not tonnage (switch Measure to Value).
Demand & logistics

Where the coal went in Q1 2026

Top destination markets and loading ports this quarter, each set against the same quarter a year earlier (Q1 2025) for a like-for-like, seasonally fair comparison.

Destination markets: Q1 2026 vs Q1 2025 (Mt)

MarketQ1 ’26Q1 ’25Δ YoY
1Japan9.468.66 +9.3%
2India9.168.76 +4.6%
3South Korea7.956.41 +24.0%
4China4.784.90 -2.4%
5Vietnam4.113.68 +11.9%
6Taiwan1.752.13 -17.9%
7Netherlands1.431.04 +37.8%
8Indonesia1.071.14 -5.9%

Loading ports: Q1 2026 vs Q1 2025 (Mt)

PortQ1 ’26Q1 ’25Δ YoY
1Gladstone Port15.2814.35 +6.5%
2Dalrymple Bay12.0111.52 +4.3%
3Hay Point7.707.58 +1.6%
4Abbot Point7.598.24 -7.8%
5Port of Brisbane1.521.11 +37.0%
Product mix

By coal grade

Queensland's premium metallurgical (coking) grades dominate the tonnage; thermal coal is the balance. Shown for Q1 2026 against the same quarter last year.

Coal grade: Q1 2026 vs Q1 2025 (Mt)

GradeQ1 ’26Q1 ’25ShareΔ YoY
1Hard Coking19.4118.5544% +4.7%
2PCI8.187.8619% +4.1%
3Semi-Soft2.112.105% +0.6%
4Thermal14.4414.2933% +1.0%
What it means

Outlook & operational read

Grounded in the data above, not forecasts: here is how the picture bears on shipping operations.

Vessel-call demand looks stable

Export volume has held flat at roughly 193–204 Mt a year recently, so port-call frequency should hold near current levels absent a major price or weather shock.

Watch the India / Japan gap

India (9.2 Mt this quarter) has drawn to within ~3.2% of Japan (9.5 Mt) and is the one large market still adding metallurgical demand, a shift in the destination mix to plan around.

Revenue risk is price, not volume

Implied value per tonne is down ≈54% from its 2022 peak on near-flat tonnage, so client earnings (and demurrage tolerance) track coal prices far more than shipped volume.

Plan for the Q1 wet-season dip

Q1 is usually the softest quarter (-18.8% on the prior quarter); berth, laycan and rail congestion typically rebuild through Q2–Q4 as volumes recover.